Press "Enter" to skip to content

Do diagonals of a kite always bisect each other?

We also know that the angles created by unequal-length sides are always congruent. Finally, we know that the kite’s diagonals always cross at a right angle and one diagonal always bisects the other.

What properties does a kite have?


  • The two angles are equal where the unequal sides meet.
  • It can be viewed as a pair of congruent triangles with a common base.
  • It has 2 diagonals that intersect each other at right angles.
  • The longer or main diagonal bisects the other diagonal.
  • A kite is symmetrical about its main diagonal.

What diagonals do not bisect each other?

Diagonals do not bisect each other in a trapezium.

  • The bases of the trapezium are parallel to each other.
  • No sides, angles and diagonals are congruent.
  • therefore the diadonals do not bisect each other in a trapesium.

What shapes do diagonals bisect each other?


in these quadrilaterals, the diagonals bisect each other paralellogram, rectangle, rhombus, square
in these quadrilaterals, the diagonals are congruent rectangle, square, isosceles trapezoid
in these quadrilaterals, each of the diagonals bisects a pair of opposite angles rhombus, square

What happens when diagonals bisect each other?

The diagonals of a parallelogram bisect each other. In any parallelogram, the diagonals (lines linking opposite corners) bisect each other. That is, each diagonal cuts the other into two equal parts. In the figure above drag any vertex to reshape the parallelogram and convince your self this is so.

What is true about diagonals of a rhombus?

A Rhombus is a flat shape with 4 equal straight sides. Opposite sides are parallel, and opposite angles are equal (it is a Parallelogram). And the diagonals “p” and “q” of a rhombus bisect each other at right angles.

Which is not true about the diagonals of a rhombus?

Answer: Step-by-step explanation: False The diagonals of a rhombus bisect each other at right angles, while the diagonals of a rectangle are equal in length. Hence,the above statement is false.